Monday, January 15, 2007

U.S. considers fence across Canada border

Add the spectre of security walls rising along "the world's longest undefended border" to a federal election campaign already being driven by debate about Canada's relations with the United States.

The U.S. House of Representatives voted late Thursday to consider erecting "physical barriers" along the American border with Canada, the firmest step yet toward building the kinds of fences now in place on the Mexican frontier to stop the northward flow of illegal aliens and smuggled goods.

The directive to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security was passed by a strong majority of the House and contained in an amendment to a controversial immigration bill working its way through Congress.

The motion cleared the way for about 1,100 kilometres of new fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California, but also urged the agency to "conduct a study on the use of physical barriers along the northern border."

Clashes between Prime Minister Paul Martin and U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins over climate change, handguns and softwood lumber -- prompting Martin's stump-speech pledge not to be "dictated to" by the U.S. -- have soured U.S.-Canada relations and prompted opposition claims the Liberals are recklessly provoking conflicts to win votes.

On Friday, a spokesperson for Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan, who is responsible for handling cross-border security issues in the federal cabinet, said barriers have not been part of Canada's security strategy and have not been raised in bilateral discussions with the U.S.

"Given the size of the border, you're not going to have a wall all along the border," said Alex Swann, noting that "static" defences are widely viewed as less effective than risk-reduction measures such as identity cards.

"You never rule out anything in the security game," he added, but "it's not a priority for us."

Sponsored by Rep. Duncan Hunter, a California Republican who has long championed fences and walls to halt illegal crossings in the southwestern U.S., the plan to shore up America's borders passed by a vote of 260-159 on Thursday but was strongly denounced by some Democrats as a "Berlin Wall" for North America.

"America with walls between Canada and Mexico is not an America that reaches out for people to come here legally," argued Rep. Sam Farr, a California Democrat.

Farr's press secretary, Jessica Schafer, told CanWest News Service on Friday the congressman will keep fighting to have the fence provisions stripped from the final legislation.

"This would be a massive change in how the borders with Canada and Mexico operate," she said. "Canada is supposed to be our friend. Why in the world would we do this?"

Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, one of the strongest proponents of the immigration bill and a backer of the Hunter amendment, said during

Thursday's debate: "Our nation has lost control of its borders, which has resulted in a sharp increase in illegal immigration and has left us vulnerable to infiltration by terrorists and criminals."

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

BIG COMPLAINT
How can a lawyer help a criminal sponsor a person into the country when he is not paying child or spousal support????

she was denied entrance once nd you appealed for her now she got into the country in May 28 and Mohammed Wehbi is been looked by police for not paying support and prostitution

i can see the kind of business you are running